Quote:
|
Originally Posted by daswig
DON'T DO IT!!!!
I really was both pissed off and amused by the "you're a bigot!" thing earlier. If you had ANY idea about my background, ties to the homosexual community, et cetera, you'd understand why.
|
Care to indluge us? Insight into your backround may serve to answer some questions, though it could potentially bring up more. Your call.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by daswig
BTW, in my book, calling somebody or an entire class of somebodys a pervert/s is not what I'd consider to be an insult. I generally define a "pervert" as somebody who engages in illegal sex acts of one form or another. Considering what sex acts are illegal where I am, active homosexuals are, by definition, perverts in my book, just as I'm a pervert, ALMOST all of my friends of perverts (I know one couple that used to be perverts, but then got fundie religion, and now obey the law, meaning they have sex only for procreation, in an unlit room, on a bed, wearing 80% body coverage with nightclothes, in the missionary position, and they don't enjoy it, but for some unknown reason, we've "grown distant"...These are the same people who begged my wife and I to go to church with them, and then introduced us to their pastor as "our Heathen Friends"...  ) my wife is a pervert, hell, my MOM is presumably a pervert. The ONLY person I know FOR SURE isn't a pervert in my book that I really, really "dig" is my daughter, who is under 7 months old. A homosexual could potentially NOT be a pervert, but ONLY if they were celibate. If you were to come up to me and a group of my friends and ask "which one of yall are perverts!", we'd all gleefully raise our hands. I s'pose it's kind of like the people who write "Yes, please!" in the "sex" box on a job application. |
You think gay people are perverts (by your definition) when they have sex. You are a self proclaimed pervert (again, by your own definition). Why would you not want to let fellow perverts have their day? Somehow it seems...not contradictory...but it seems to go against the idea that if you do something, you accept it in others. I'm not calling you a hypocrate, because this is a simplfied version of what's going on, but doesn't it strike you odd that one of the reasons that you don't want them to have rights happens to be something you enjoy?
Our daughters are about the same age. Mutuality's a bitch. Jk.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by daswig
As another "BTW", I oppose same-sex marriage. That doesn't mean I couldn't come up with a potentially agreeable solution to the problem for most of the people on this board that I would agree with. It would involve removing the State from the marriage business alltogether.
|
Hahahaha. We are in agreement yet again. The state should have very little to do with marriage. You should get the license, and the basic rights, and then they should leave us to our liberties.