Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

KMA-628 · 02-03-2005, 07:40 PM

Now wait a minute.

Where did I say that Iraq and Al Qaeda had collaborated on attacks on the U.S.?

You are a little off on this one.

I was responding to the "never never" comment from above.

While I do not think there was a lot of going on between Iraq and Al Qaeda, the "never never" comment just isn't true.

Also, the article cites the Commission's report. Where does it say that the things I quoted only came from BushCo.?

Without dragging out the book, the commission said that there had been some interactions between Iraq and Al Qaeda, not much but there were some.

You can't allow inclusion of the commission's report only if it serves your purpose (i.e., i don't see you commenting on drakers mentioning the 9/11 commission). If it is good enough for his argument, then it is good enough for mine.

I didn't bring the commission into this argument to back up some wild allegation. I used an article relating to the commission's report to debunk a comment about the report that isn't true.

02-03-2005, 07:40 PM	#83 (permalink)
KMA-628 ....is off his meds...you were warned. Location: The Wild Wild West	Now wait a minute. Where did I say that Iraq and Al Qaeda had collaborated on attacks on the U.S.? You are a little off on this one. I was responding to the "never never" comment from above. While I do not think there was a lot of going on between Iraq and Al Qaeda, the "never never" comment just isn't true. Also, the article cites the Commission's report. Where does it say that the things I quoted only came from BushCo.? Without dragging out the book, the commission said that there had been some interactions between Iraq and Al Qaeda, not much but there were some. You can't allow inclusion of the commission's report only if it serves your purpose (i.e., i don't see you commenting on drakers mentioning the 9/11 commission). If it is good enough for his argument, then it is good enough for mine. I didn't bring the commission into this argument to back up some wild allegation. I used an article relating to the commission's report to debunk a comment about the report that isn't true.