I have to admit from the sounds of things (because there is no link and I haven't done a search because I'm pretty sure i get the idea now) ... oh yes, from the sound of things...
It seems to me that this preacher was arrested for 'trying' to insite a riot to go after homosexuals, but had not actually managed to succeed in this task. However he did discriminate against homosexuals by not allowing them to join his congragation. (please fogive any spelling errors...in a bit of a hurry
)
The problem I see is he is being punished for something he 'tried' to do along side something he did. I would have much rather have seen this riot come to life and taken more then one person to use as an example. I'm not saying I am hoping for some bad thing to happen to homosexuals because quite honestly I fully support them and their rights to be protected. But the simple truth is, trying to do something and doing something are two different things. Good-prosecute to the fullest of the law for his discrimination, but how can you hold him also accountable for something that didn't fully come to be??
Please know I'm on my way out the door, but had to say something, I will be happy to recheck this post in just a few
