View Single Post
Old 02-03-2005, 07:38 AM   #36 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
the question of wage levels is political.
if you ever find yourself having to look at industrial production historically, wages become sraight away one of the main indices of the main political players, and the balance of power that obtains between them. but this balance only makes sense if you take account of the various frames that situate it. so wage levels are not really matters that can be thought about coherently in isolation.

one way of managing the question is to shape and control the metaphors that folk have recourse to when it gets to the most complicated issue. so above, on this question, recourse was had to the mythical "small business" which operates in a marginal scenario economically and so is vulnerable to shifts in boundary conditions. this association is ideological. it is interesting that counterarguments were statged by way of concerns like walmart, which track the path of concentration--huge businesses that use the dominant ideology to justify increased exploitation through depressed wages. what is curious (to me anyway) is that this shift could be made across the question of defining the "service sector" without it leading to any real attack on more general frames.

the americans operate within neoliberal ideology--an ideology that is so dominant that it does not have a name. the question of wage levels is formulated within the general ideology of markets that are somehow self-regulating (or would be if hayek-world had any contact with the empirical world) that in turn situates the recourse to the mythical small business. this same ideology rationalizes the social consequences of economic decisions by essentially blaming working people for their exploitation.

neoliberal ideology is remarkably weak internally, very much open to critique once you arrive a point of being able to name it and formalize its rules. neoliberal ideology results in amazing brutality in economic relations that are rationalized by imputing moral failings to the victims.

is the minimum wage too low? yes.
what maintains this situation? the conditions outlined above.
should the minimum wage be raised? obviously, yes.
but the matter moves immediately from that to the larger question of how, politically, economic activity is to be understood, neoliberal assumptions remove social consequences from consideration of economic activity. it is only on the basis of such a seperation that raising wages can possibly be opposed.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360