Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
All the libs can say is "no matter what the outcome it is still wrong wrong wrong. bush lied." Get over it. He didn't lie, he was misinformed on a few issues. WMD's were not the sole reason we went war anyway, there were many more reasons, and all you can do is cling on to the one thing that was not entirely accurate.
|
Would you, or not, agree that WMD was the issue that Powell tried to sell the UN?
Would you, or not, agree that WMD was the issue that drove Bush's speech to the nation as reason to invade?
You say that WMDs were not the sole reason. And yet, at the time it happened, that's all I remember hearing about. Can you please educate me what other issues there were - AT THAT TIME?
You suggest that one thing (WMD) "was not entirely accurate". What fascinating spin. I would have said "entirely not accurate". Funny what word order can do.
Whether you want to blame faulty intelligence, or outright lies, would you, or not, agree that we have found exactly ZERO WMD?