Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blaspheme
While I agree that it sounds like the woman in question was being solicited as a prostitute, it doesn't actually say that anywhere. I think it would be pretty amusing if after all the fuss and worldwide news stories we find out that they wanted to hire her as a receptionist, or housekeeper, or bartender, etc. 
Would that circumstance change your opinion? We all seem to more or less agree that it would be unconscionable to force some woman to become a prostitute. Suppose though, that she was not performing sexual functions. If her only objection was on the grounds that she was morally opposed to prostitution, would that justify her remaining on the unemployment roster? |
Wow...talk about becareful of what you wish for. Why don't they just cut them off after a year of unemployment? No forcing anybody into doing anything they don't want to do and you get rid of your leeches every year.
I don't know all the details but yeah I suppose if she is morally against it she should just take the hit without the unemployement. If you are willing to leech off the government you have to play by their rules. Period.