|
Judging by the private message I received, I take it my post was not clear enough:
This study is pseudo-science, if it generates enough media induced hub-ub it might warrant being contradicted by about ten other better run studies. People have been searching for a gay gene for a long time, and pointing to genetic trivial similarities in sequence proves nothing.
Until you can prove gene---->protein---->function. You have proved exactly NOTHING, NADA. Show me the polygenic gay gene group, show me its cascading effects, show me how its protein products alter behavior. Until you can talk about the issue in completness you got nothin.
Do you understand how far we are from understanding the connection between dna and behavior? Mark my words, this study will fizzle like so many before it
__________________
"Jombe? The chocolate icing" -hedonism bot
|