smooth

I posted this in an earlier thread, so I won't go through all the details. Basically, if one could demonstrate that the harm was ongoing, statute of limitations wouldn't apply.

Also, your use of "statute of limitations" is backwards. If there is no limitation, then one can sue at any time, it doesn't render the tort claim "ridiculous."

__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman