Quote:
Originally Posted by mojodragon
Now, a couple of different things happen when the strangers get this bit of news. If someone hears about the story on the radio, they don’t have any pictures of any of the participants. So, most people picture themselves in one of the roles. This isn’t intentional, it’s just what pops into people’s heads. These people suffer mental and spiritual damage from the attack, no matter which role they play in the little visualization.
If someone reads about the story in the paper or sees it on the news, they get pictures of the victim and the “alleged” attacker. Now, in their visualization, they don’t have to picture themselves. They can picture the attack itself. And thanks to the accuracy of most news reports, they can form a pretty accurate recreation.
In a way, the victim is being victimized over and over again, in the minds of every person that reads or sees the story. Also, the crime is discussed at people’s workplaces, where details of the crimes are recalled. “Did you hear that he did this…?”
|
I would argue against the statement that most people visualize themselves in one of the roles. This has no factual basis, it's just that if anything I think people would make a conscious effort not to.
Also, I don't consider the "imaginary" victim being victimized as an actual cause of harm or distress so long as it is not taking place in her own mind.
...but yes, the media sucks. I watch BBC on PBS whenever I get a chance, and read all my news from
BBC World News. Compared to American media, they're totally nonbiased and focus primarily on world events and politics. I get my Business news (a necessity for me) from CNBC, mostly. I NEVER watch the local news, "news magazine" shows (60 minutes, dateline, etc.) or any of that garbage.