|
For what it's worth, I agree with Yakk.
One can prove just about anything, If one is allowed to redefine words in any way one pleases.
Observe:
Proof of the existence of God:
1. God is the universe.
2. The universe exists.
3. Therefore God exists.
Perhaps Yakk and I just don't get it?
Yakk seemed (to me at least) to show how Art's position coould be used to prove that rocks are intelligent. This is clearly false, so in what way did Yakk misapply Art's position?
__________________
|