Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
The problem is that the only "awareness" that is trying to be raised is about the gloriousness of gays. It seems that most liberals want all sex to be seen as normal and no big deal (if you have modesty you're obviously some repressed prude) except for gay sex which is the most wonderful thing ever since sliced bread. If a student thinks that the act of two men having sex with each other is morally wrong, there is nothing wrong with that. That person is not any less than anyone else, they are not a bigot or homophobe. Now, should they necessarily go around beating up gays? No. Just like poeple who have other qualities that might be deemed negative shouldn't be harassed. But there is no reason that certain insults should be singled out.
And personally, I think that is what this is about. It isn't about not calling people fatty or nigger or spic or retard, it's all about calling people faggots. Honestly, if anyone is called out their name it should be equally punished. What shouldn't be forced down on people is a liberal moral code where acceptance of everything (except Christianity) is the norm.
|
I guess i missed the part where the article said that only homophobic slurs were being discouraged. I see your post, and then i see the article, and i see that they share very few common ideas. Did you read the article, or did you just immediately overwrite it in your mind with some sort of antihomophobe rant?
I saw nothing about the "gloriousness of gays". I hope that you are able to see the difference between disdain for homosexuality and overt vocal hostility towards homosexuality/homosexuals. One is okay, if not just a tad bit sad, and the other is completely unacceptable.