Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
Sorry, but that's an incredibly weak excuse. If someone spins the truth it does not mean all of his arguments and positions are void. I know you would like to summarily dismiss Moore and therefore you attempt to pinpoint a handful of cases where information has been distorted to do so. But an instance of distortion does not even come close to making all of his arguments and positions void.
Nice try. But only the people that already think like that will agree to those terms of discourse. And even then, it will be hypocritical, as there has never been a person who has been 100% objective in their discourse, therefore your logic requires you to dismiss all arguments and positions, by anyone and everyone, as void. And the first step is to dismiss your own arguments and positions.
|
So you will defend Rush and Ann Coultier?