standards of evidence don't make innocent people guilty. or guilty people innocent. they just change verdicts. you imply that these people are really guilty, and they'd be found that way with looser standards of evidence. the only argument i see there is "if we were allowed to make more mistakes, we would find more of them guilty." It's hogwash.
That you even feel the need to compare nations that lead the world to a group of terrorists shows the depravity of your arguement.
That they stoop that low ought to have no bearing on our conduct at all.
__________________
For God so loved creation, that God sent God's only Son that whosoever believed should not perish, but have everlasting life.
-John 3:16
|