|
To you both, yes I read it and yes, it says exactly what I said it says.
(But no, I couldn't find it again easily.)
So to distill, he still doesn't say that the plant he says are making (present tense) WMDs is in fact not.
The last missle produced at that plant was in the mid 80's and as I recall, before Kliebold and Harris was even born.
So what do we have? We have a larger philosophical argument, that LM as a company makes weapons systems (they never made the actual bombs, but they did make rockets), vs what MM actually says.
Is this just 'artistic liscense'? I don't beleive so, because MM is trying to get the viewer to believe some connection between that particular plant and the massacre at Columbine. I say this because he NEVER tries to correct or explain himself. Instead, he continues this same obfusication again in Colorado Springs when he deliberately lies about what a plaque under a B52 says and again, when he deliberately edits several Heston speeches to make the view believe that Heston gave a speech that he never in reality gave.
This is not the marks of a documentary or of journalistic integrity, they are are the marks of propaganda.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis
The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!
Please Donate!
|