Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Manx
You're having some serious issues with post hoc, ergo propter hoc. After this, therefore because of this. Simply because military strategists and anti-war people predicted that the war would not be anything close to the walk in the park the pro-war crowd suggested most certainly does not mean that the war was not the walk in the park the pro-war crowd suggested because military strategists and anti-war people predicted it would not.
|
And you don't seem to understand that the anti-war people led by Ramsey Clark's "International A.N.S.W.E.R." (You remember Ramsey Clark, right? Saddam Hussein's attorney of record in the United States, right?) virtually gave the Iraqi resistance a blueprint on how to try to weaken American resolve in the war. When a group with extensive ties to the enemy starts saying "this is how the US will lose the war", and the enemy starts following their blueprint, it makes a rational person wonder if there might be some collusion going on there, yes?