Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodyhammer86
What difference does this make? The point is that this overweight, self-hating jackass is a hypocrite and contradicts himself countless times, by making a lie-filled shitfest of a film (better known as Bowling for Columbine), stating that all guns should be banned, and then having an armed bodyguard. Sounds like a classic case of "do what I say but not as I do"
|
Have you seen Bowling For Columbine? The movie doesnt have an anti-gun message at all. At all. Its not in the movie. Thats not what its about. I really dont like MM or think his material is particularly intelligent or even factual.. but BFC was not an anti-gun movie... theres nothing ironic in the article that i can see..