In these two threads, the prospects, theories and opinions seemed rather grimm. Perhaps it reflected the reality or the trend in international relations, especially the dynamic between the industrialised Western world and the developing world.
Two things:
1. I found George Bush's inauguration speech (or at least parts of it) to be intrigueing. I interpreted it as the willingness of the US to interfere in other countries to stop tyranny and to spread freedom.
If taken at face value, then presumably we will be heading into Sudan, Rwanda, and countless other oppressive regimes to "spread freedom", and stop tyranny. One by one. Optimistic? Yes. Hopeful? Yes. Idealized? Yes. But one has to start somewhere right? Might as well exercise some "benign hegemony".
Now before people get all bent out of shape, work with me here. Think outside of the box for a minute before we deteriorate into the usual cynicism. If we keep an open mind, (but not so much that our brains fall out), I don't know, the imagination gets provoked.
2. I found this article to be interesting:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4185713.stm
Maybe we can learn some lessons from Rwanda: 10 years too late is still better than never, right?
I want to attempt to try and analyise and synthesise here. Really focus on the issues and attempt to apply 'scientific' methodology in formulating opinions and theories. To put the 'politics' aside in the politics.
I believe there is a connection here to Iraq, Iran, the tsunami disasters, the future role of NATO, the EU, Israel-Palestine, AIDS crisis and more.
Bush 1 referred to "A New World Order". Perhaps a new paradigm is taking place, a new shift in globalisation and international relations.