Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bodyhammer86
What difference does this make? The point is that this overweight, self-hating jackass is a hypocrite and contradicts himself countless times, by making a lie-filled shitfest of a film (better known as Bowling for Columbine), stating that all guns should be banned, and then having an armed bodyguard. Sounds like a classic case of "do what I say but not as I do"
|
No, there are better films on cesspools than "Bowling for Columbine," but THIS is the classic case:
Carl Rowan, one of the country's foremost gun control advocates, stated in his syndicated column that "If you have a gun you should go to jail- period."
One night, Rowan heard people trespassing on his property. He produced an unregistered .22 pistol, fired a warning shot in their direction, and hit one of them in the wrist. Rowan was not convicted or jailed for possessing a gun despite Washington DC's strict gun laws.
The trespassers, if memory serves, turned out to be young people who'd decided to sneak into his pool for a swim.
Rowan tried to avoid responsibility by claiming the gun belonged to his son, an FBI agent.