hmm... well, the thread is about the GI's on the ground. it seems clear to me that your original statement was in fact directed towards them. i think a discount should have been made if referring to policymakers was really part of your original intent.
and i don't think i can even go as far as your last statement.
are you saying that a monopoly on the high ground can't be had under any circumstance?
does being the "guys in the white hats" necessarily entail that there be no "black hats" among them?
if the answer is "yes", then how can any significant number of people do something truly good? if the answer is "no", then why is abu graib and these british photos an issue with anyone if they believe only a tiny fraction of a single percent of those wearing uniforms are involved?
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
~ Winston Churchill
|