Quote:
Originally Posted by Superbelt
I can't get to everything you said, but I will by at least monday night.o one of your questions:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...hlight=Lincoln
From me:
The "Great" presidents, like Roosevelt and Lincoln openly violated the constitution. Lincoln basically suspended the entire thing and ruled the Union as a dictator in wartime, thankfully he restored it after the war was over.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superbelt
Neither of us specifically cite Habeas Corpus but we both allude to it in a manner that is obvious to anyone who is even remotely well read in American Civil War History.
So, we are on record to this.
|
Well, I cited it, but you apparently didn't read it. Lincoln didn't suspend the Constitution. Here it is again:
Habeas, the Constitution
Quote:
Did President Lincoln suspend the U.S. Constitution?
Answer: No
Did President Lincoln suspend Habeas Corpus?
Answer: Yes, in 1861 and 1862
Was Habeas Corpus ever restored?
Answer: Yes, in 1866.
Here's the story:
As the Civil War started, in the very beginning of Lincoln's presidential term, a group of "Peace Democrats" proposed a peaceful resolution to the developing Civil War by offering a truce with the South, and forming a constitutional convention to amend the U.S. Constitution to protect States' rights. The proposal was ignored by the Unionists of the North and not taken seriously by the South. However, the Peace Democrats, also called copperheads by their enemies, publicly criticized Lincoln's belief that violating the U.S. Constitution was required to save it as a whole. With Congress not in session until July, Lincoln assumed all powers not delegated in the Constitution, including the power to suspend habeas corpus. In 1861, Lincoln had already suspended civil law in territories where resistance to the North's military power would be dangerous. In 1862, when copperhead democrats began criticizing Lincoln's violation of the Constitution, Lincoln suspended habeas corpus throughout the nation and had many copperhead democrats arrested under military authority because he felt that the State Courts in the north west would not convict war protesters such as the copperheads. He proclaimed that all persons who discouraged enlistments or engaged in disloyal practices would come under Martial Law.
Among the 13,000 people arrested under martial law was a Maryland Secessionist, John Merryman. Immediately, Hon. Roger B. Taney, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States issued a writ of habeas corpus commanding the military to bring Merryman before him. The military refused to follow the writ. Justice Taney, in Ex parte MERRYMAN, then ruled the suspension of habeas corpus unconstitutional because the writ could not be suspended without an Act of Congress. President Lincoln and the military ignored Justice Taney's ruling.
Finally, in 1866, after the war, the Supreme Court officially restored habeas corpus in Ex-parte Milligan, ruling that military trials in areas where the civil courts were capable of functioning were illegal.
Copyright, 1999
American Patriot Network
|
Just for emphasis, as you can see above, the Supreme Court restored Habeas Corpus after the war. Lincoln was hindered in doing so, since he happened to be dead at the time.
By the way, does it meet with your approval for a president to rule the Union "as a dictator in wartime?"
Thanks in advance.