Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

Lebell · 01-14-2005, 05:34 PM

On a slightly different note, I usually don't care to go into depth when reading legal opinions as I find them dry and overly verbose (I already have plenty of that when reading computer texts), so I usually skip to the conclusion or executive summary.

But this scholarly paper was actually a good read.

http://www.saf.org/journal/11McClurg.pdf

In it, the author, Andrew J. McClurg tackles the myths and fallacies on both sides of the debate.

For anyone interested in an honest attempt at digging into the issues that keep both sides of the gun debate issue appart, I recommend it.

01-14-2005, 05:34 PM	#93 (permalink)
Lebell Cracking the Whip Location: Sexymama's arms...	On a slightly different note, I usually don't care to go into depth when reading legal opinions as I find them dry and overly verbose (I already have plenty of that when reading computer texts), so I usually skip to the conclusion or executive summary. But this scholarly paper was actually a good read. http://www.saf.org/journal/11McClurg.pdf In it, the author, Andrew J. McClurg tackles the myths and fallacies on both sides of the debate. For anyone interested in an honest attempt at digging into the issues that keep both sides of the gun debate issue appart, I recommend it. __________________ "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU! Please Donate!