Quote:
Originally Posted by theburner
First off, we are being way too general. Why? Well, if we look at a game of Chess on the computer, the context of being beaten makes sense. The game does indeed beat you. Same with the C&C Series of games. You can indeed be beaten by the AI. Same with sports games, you can be beaten.
Your comment <b> They don't beat the game of hockey when they win</b> doesn't hold water with me. I don't beat "computer games" when I beat C&C, I beat the enemy at the time.
I do agree with your comments about the RPG's though.. I just finished KOTOR II and don't consider myself beating the final boss or the game. I consider victory in RPG's to be "finishing the game".
Also, I do consider the game "beating" me if I don't finish it because it was too hard.
I guess it is personal preference when it comes to how you describe "victory" in a game.
|
So... you agree with me? The hockey comment you made is a bit confusing (the argument not holding water bit).
I stated above that when two competing entities are striving for the same goal (chess, hockey, typical RTS games) the term "beat" applies. I guess I'm mostly commenting on how people use it as a general term. I know it is semantics, but hey, why not strive to the best we can? Linguistic laziness, as it were. Yeah, yeah, I'm anal, people who know me realized this long ago.