Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

Willravel · 01-12-2005, 01:36 PM

I just finished rereading the 9/11 Comission Report. Yikes. A wonderful array of dodged questions and wrong answers. Anyone who likes the comic strip might like the 9/11 Commission Final Report. It's quite funny.

For those who asked "who really is responsible?":
9/11 was the greatest crime in American history. The official story of 9/11 posits that 19 Arab terrorists hijacked four planes and crashed three of them into well-known American landmarks, costing more than three thousand Americans their lives. Yet no conclusive evidence has ever connected these alleged Arab terrorists to the actual crime. Only a campaign of media hysteria centered around vague and unproved aspersions from Washington has swayed the American people into accepting government's story, which amounts to a massive hate crime against Muslims.

So who dropped the ball? Who's reponsibility was/is it to investigate what happened and try to bring th guilty to justice? Why the Attorney General, of course. "The Attorney General, as head of the Department of Justice and chief law enforcement officer of the Federal Government, represents the United States in legal matters generally and gives advice and opinions to the President and to the heads of the executive departments of the Government when so requested. The Attorney General appears in person to represent the Government before the U.S. Supreme Court in cases of exceptional gravity or importance." Exceptional gravity and importance. Like 9/11 maybe? Well, as it has been made pretty obvious in this thread, the 9/11 investigation missed some tiny details.

Details like:
- all of the wrekage from the twin towers was shipped off, sold, and melted down before FEMA or any other investigators could test it.
- a multitude of people were present in the wtc when the planes hit and saw and heard explosions going off, dozens of floors below the plane crash. (there was no cumbustable fuel in the building beyond the plane fuel)
- a multitude of people persent noticed that the commercial airliner had no windows. Rather odd, eh?
- video evidence shows the building was demolished using explosives, as it is impossible for the heat to be evenly distributed over the entire structure so that it completly melts and collapses all at the same time.
- even the FEMA report admits that they are confues and baffeled as to how building 7 of the WTC collapsed
- the investigation team supposedly found on of the terrorists passports in the wrekage of the wtc.
- the video of the 757 hitting the pentagon was at the wrong speed (if it were correct, the plane would have been going approx. 275-325 mph, which contradicts the reports).
- the damage at the pentagon is not consistant with the damage that should have been there. The windows where the wings were said to hit weren't even broken! Th hole in the back wall is the wrong size (for the fuseloge OR the engines)
- the tapes that recorded the pentagon crash were taken and never returned
- almost no smoke or heat damage to the pentagon despite 8600 galons of burning fuel that wouyld have been left by the 757
- firefighters were told to pull out of building 7 immediataslly before it collapsed, despite the fact it only had a minor fire.

None of these were addressed by the investigators or the 9/11 Commission or the Attorney General.

What should the Attorney General have done? First, instead of locking up every headscarfed Muslim between Boston and West Covina, he would inquire discreetly about every single financial transaction that was made in the two weeks before 9/11, and quickly determine exactly who made the most significant profits. In a very short time he would discover the names of the investors who made millions from those "put" options purchased on United and American Airlines. Ever heard the term "war profiteering"? Those people would be brough in for legal questioning. These people, not being very strong under pressure, would simply fold. Suddenly we would have some names and trails to follow. The FBI and other aronymed people would actually do their jobs and go out and make arrests. Indictments, hundreds of them, for treason, conspiracy to commit mass murder, and obstruction of justice. They would be sentenced, and the "War on Terror" would essentially be over, as it is baseless.

Of course this could only happen with a real Attorney General who worked for all the people and not just the rich. Also, it's important to to remember this could only happen in a legitimate democracy.

01-12-2005, 01:36 PM	#218 (permalink)
Willravel ... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.	I just finished rereading the 9/11 Comission Report. Yikes. A wonderful array of dodged questions and wrong answers. Anyone who likes the comic strip might like the 9/11 Commission Final Report. It's quite funny. For those who asked "who really is responsible?": 9/11 was the greatest crime in American history. The official story of 9/11 posits that 19 Arab terrorists hijacked four planes and crashed three of them into well-known American landmarks, costing more than three thousand Americans their lives. Yet no conclusive evidence has ever connected these alleged Arab terrorists to the actual crime. Only a campaign of media hysteria centered around vague and unproved aspersions from Washington has swayed the American people into accepting government's story, which amounts to a massive hate crime against Muslims. So who dropped the ball? Who's reponsibility was/is it to investigate what happened and try to bring th guilty to justice? Why the Attorney General, of course. "The Attorney General, as head of the Department of Justice and chief law enforcement officer of the Federal Government, represents the United States in legal matters generally and gives advice and opinions to the President and to the heads of the executive departments of the Government when so requested. The Attorney General appears in person to represent the Government before the U.S. Supreme Court in cases of exceptional gravity or importance." Exceptional gravity and importance. Like 9/11 maybe? Well, as it has been made pretty obvious in this thread, the 9/11 investigation missed some tiny details. Details like: - all of the wrekage from the twin towers was shipped off, sold, and melted down before FEMA or any other investigators could test it. - a multitude of people were present in the wtc when the planes hit and saw and heard explosions going off, dozens of floors below the plane crash. (there was no cumbustable fuel in the building beyond the plane fuel) - a multitude of people persent noticed that the commercial airliner had no windows. Rather odd, eh? - video evidence shows the building was demolished using explosives, as it is impossible for the heat to be evenly distributed over the entire structure so that it completly melts and collapses all at the same time. - even the FEMA report admits that they are confues and baffeled as to how building 7 of the WTC collapsed - the investigation team supposedly found on of the terrorists passports in the wrekage of the wtc. - the video of the 757 hitting the pentagon was at the wrong speed (if it were correct, the plane would have been going approx. 275-325 mph, which contradicts the reports). - the damage at the pentagon is not consistant with the damage that should have been there. The windows where the wings were said to hit weren't even broken! Th hole in the back wall is the wrong size (for the fuseloge OR the engines) - the tapes that recorded the pentagon crash were taken and never returned - almost no smoke or heat damage to the pentagon despite 8600 galons of burning fuel that wouyld have been left by the 757 - firefighters were told to pull out of building 7 immediataslly before it collapsed, despite the fact it only had a minor fire. None of these were addressed by the investigators or the 9/11 Commission or the Attorney General. What should the Attorney General have done? First, instead of locking up every headscarfed Muslim between Boston and West Covina, he would inquire discreetly about every single financial transaction that was made in the two weeks before 9/11, and quickly determine exactly who made the most significant profits. In a very short time he would discover the names of the investors who made millions from those "put" options purchased on United and American Airlines. Ever heard the term "war profiteering"? Those people would be brough in for legal questioning. These people, not being very strong under pressure, would simply fold. Suddenly we would have some names and trails to follow. The FBI and other aronymed people would actually do their jobs and go out and make arrests. Indictments, hundreds of them, for treason, conspiracy to commit mass murder, and obstruction of justice. They would be sentenced, and the "War on Terror" would essentially be over, as it is baseless. Of course this could only happen with a real Attorney General who worked for all the people and not just the rich. Also, it's important to to remember this could only happen in a legitimate democracy.