Quote:
Who's to say those civilians didn't have guns or bombs strapped to them?
|
This is more ludicrous than Ananas' statement. If you are referring to the individuals who were forced into the river, it is clear they didn't have any bombs or weapons strapped to them, otherwise, it would have been brought up in court and chances are more than likely that the victims would have used their weapons or bombs had they possessed them. Not only that, but I assume the soldiers would have gone through a completely different procedure had they feared or had reasonable suspicion that the civilians threatened their lives in anyway. This was just plain and simply a few soldiers abusing thier power and killing a innocent person. As much as you want the victims into terrorists, that is simply not the case.