View Single Post
Old 01-05-2005, 04:14 PM   #15 (permalink)
rgr22j
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mephisto
No, I think you misunderstand the point of the article.

It's not that aid has to be a PR exercise, but that a good opportunity to show the "positive" side of US foreign engagement was almost overlooked.

That's all. There's no real criticism inherent in the observation.
Mr Mephisto,

Perhaps, then, do you think, as I do, that it's a credit to the Bush administration that running to the cameras for a PR opportunity was overlooked? Send help first, make sound bites later?

At first I thought that Bush was comically ineffective at maintaining his image, making him (unjustly, in my opinion) a very polarizing figure. But perhaps the more obvious answer is that, he really doesn't care about his image.

I just heard it reported on the radio that $15 million was all that could be immediately released when the disaster struck, and that the $35 million effectively emptied out the federal disaster fund. Pledging $350 million couldn't be done without Congress, which was out of session. Seems reasonable to me, even in a disaster of this magnitude -- it's not like Congress wouldn't pass a tsunami-aid bill. Otherwise, what's to prevent Bush from claiming that Iraq qualifies for relief and pledging $250 billion or whatever? Or some future president from pledging X billion to a pet cause of his?

But the end result is that this almost comically bad timing makes it look like Bush upped the ante when faced with world criticism which, if we look at the Iraq experience, couldn't be further from the truth. So my conclusion must be that abusing the tsunami to enhance our "image," so to speak, must have not been high on his list of priorities. I think it's a credit to him. And I think it's a credit to quite a number of people -- Clinton included -- to put aside partisanship for this unthinkable disaster.

I think I read somewhere that you're from Australia. I think it's stunning what Australia has done in this disaster, and full credit to Australians everywhere. However, no offense intended, but there isn't any way I'm going to let a bunch of Aussies be more generous than us. And that's why I'm sending in more money to the relief fund. I think Bush -- as well as the rest of us Americans -- would do well with the same attitude.

-- Alvin

PS Apologies if you're not from Australia -- my memory is not as good as it used to be!
rgr22j is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360