Quote:
|
Originally Posted by McDuffie
as noted, quite wrong.
However, evolutionary biology does not rest upon carbon dating. If carbon dating didn't exist, our modern concept of evolution would not change in the very least.
|
Well, from what I remember that it was tested on artifacts that were 100 years older or less and the an exponential (SP?) graph was made. And, some think that it is inaccurate.
Is there anything out there that shows more indepth testing of carbon dating?
But, it can make a difference. If it is not accurate then it can go to show that there was nothing made before 10,000 years ago and that creationism has more bearing.
But, IMO how do we know that the dinasuars were cold blooded by their bones. What if they had hair and were warm blooded. I just think that we need someone out there cross testing all this science to make sure that they are correct, because I have seen reports that have disproven some of the basis for random life.