smooth

The courts have consistently ruled that the freedom of speech can properly be constrained in time and place. Any time one's actions are going to, or likely to produce violence or harm to someone, the right to expression is properly limited.

Look, I don't know if you are actually serious about your question. I'm not going to go traipsing around the internet finding case after case to build a legal argument against your position.

Nor am I going to sit here and type out page after page from one of my law texts.

If you are seriously interested in whether your opinion is legally correct, call an attorney in the morning, ask for a quick legal consultation, and read him or her exactly what you typed into here. Then ask if it's legal.

Please respond to me in the morning whether the first thing he or she says to you is, "Please tell me you didn't do that?"

__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman