Coulter is a bit more extreme than Moore.
Although they can easily be refuted, Moore actually has valid info to back up his claims. Moore makes a claim, states X, Y, and Z about it, and it gets refuted. However, the info that's used to refute Moore's claims can also be countered easily, which opens some type of debate.
Coulter just blurts out shit like, "Canada's lucky we didn't take them over". What the fuck kind of thing is THAT to say? I've read her books, and she contributes nothing serious to politics. You sit there the whole time thinking, "she CAN'T be for real.."
Love him or hate him, at least Moore provides something to be thought about.
__________________
I love lamp.
Last edited by Stompy; 12-28-2004 at 10:55 AM..
|