Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Locobot
Ha, nice try but no. You won't corner me by getting me to admit that there are real biological differences between various groups of people that we understand as "races." I admit that freely. That's not racism.
|
Thank you for acknowledging one of my points.
Quote:
|
My plans were suggestions based on what I gathered from your posts above about what you mean by "common sense." Common sense is not a plan by the way, it's not something that can be taught or tested and apparantly from your inability to elucidate further it means nothing.
|
Childish insult noted. However, I never called common sense a "plan."
Quote:
|
Again these are real biological differences between different groups of people, this isn't racism. The problem comes when you start using racial signifyers to decide who is and isn't more likely to commit a crime. An example of this might be if someone says they're so certain that people from a particular asian country are harmless and non-threatening based on their race alone.
|
Once again, a deliberate misquote. I said CULTURE. Do you need a link to the post where I said it?
Quote:
|
Was that the reason I gave for asking for the thread to be locked? Let's review. I said, "there is a policy against posting content without comment, mods please lock the thread" I posted that under the false assumption that there was a policy against posting articles without commenting on them. Although this is a de facto policy that has resulted in the locking of many threads here, it is not a part of the rules (I believe this is what Rekna was implying as well).
|
That's an interesting position for an "anarchist" to take.
Quote:
|
The ACLU would have no interest in proactively creating instances of discrimination, this possibility exists only in your dreams. In any case an attorney, ACLU or not, would have no basis to challenge any search, only detainment. And even then only if the only criteria for that detainment was race. If racial profiling wasn't being used there could be no problem. The rule you're so upset about does not exist as any DOT guideline. I thought I made that clear when I was thoroughly discrediting the allegations in the original article. But apparently you missed that so I'll post it again:
|
Since you like to misquote me, it isn't surprising that you feel entitled to represent the ACLU as well.
As soon as you feel like discussing CULTURAL differences, instead of trying to invent racism where none exists, your posts might elicit some interest.
Until then, it looks like your repeated off-topic posts have pretty much killed the interest in the thread.