The problem with saying she was warned is that that doesn't allow for a legal challenge. It isn't until a (potentially) unfair law is enforced that it can be challenged. If she didn't wear the dress, there could be no legal recourse.
And I think Lebell said it best earlier, there is no real difference between the cases. Everyone said that the teacher insulted the lesbian girl, but nobody mentioned that the principal hit the vehicle of the girl who was wearing the prom dress. If one is allowed, both should be. Personally, I think neither should be allowed, and that schools should have mroe rights in restricting what students can wear (and do), but that's not the issue. The issue is if the girl wanting to wear a confederate flag has a case, and I think based on the earlier settlement she probably does.
|