View Single Post
Old 12-23-2004, 02:01 PM   #30 (permalink)
Mephisto2
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
The war had less to do with slavery, at the time, as relatively few southerners actually owned slaves.
I disagree with you, as do many Civil War historians.

A lot of (revisionist?) historians seem to like arguing this point, as I guess they don't like the taste of defending slavery. But the fact remains that slavery was fundamental to the outbreak of the war. The Southern States warned that they would secede if Lincoln was elected or inaugurated, due expressly to his anti-slavery position.

Quote:
Slaves were an expensive commodity.
Yes they were. As were plantations and large houses and horse carriages and holiday homes etc. The point is that the monied classes, those in positions of power, had slaves. And because of the invention of the cotton gin and the emergence of cotton plantations, they had most to lose.

The fact that most Southerners had no slaves has no relevance at all, as most Southerners had no real power or influence over Southern politics.

Quote:
The war began over the issue of states sovereign rights,
The right to hold slaves, the right to extend slavery to new states, the right to have escaped slaves returned etc etc.

Quote:
then evolved into an issue over slavery when President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclomation, freeing slaves only in those states in open rebellion to the US.(border states, loyal to neither, were left alone).
To say that slavery only became an issue after the Emancipation Proclamation is, at best, wrong and at worst, disengenous. It was an issue over 40 years BEFORE the war even started.

Quote:
This issue effectively kept England from formally recognizing the Confederate States as a nation, severely limiting their chances for winning the war. Which, of course, they did not.
Absolutely correct. And there was a very real danger that this would have happened. The only thing that stopped Great Britian (the world super-power of the time) from recognizing the Confederacy was the repugnance of slavery. Had the Confederates themselves considered some kind of emancipation (as recommended by several of their own politicans and generals) would have swung it towards their favour. But the fact they did not (another example of how slavery, and not State's rights were foremost in Confederate minds) coupled with the North's Emancipation Proclamation effectively sealed their fate. Britian now withheld recognition from the South, despite the Trent Affair, despite the damage to their cloth-making industry, despite the cotton embargo.. Once the North "freed the slaves" (even if it was only a first step), Britian had no choice.

Quote:

The image of the confederate battle flag has since been adopted as a symbol used by various white supremacist groups, most notably the KKK, and the Aryan Nation. This fact, coupled with revisionist history of the Civil War, has turned a once proud symbol into a feared, and much maligned, emblom of hatred.
Well, to be perfectly honest, it was the battle flag of a confederation of States, who seceded to protect slavery. It has been used ever since by racist extremists. And, as far as I remember, it's actually illegal to fly on State buildings in many countries.

In another thread I used the phrase "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it's a duck." The fact remains that the flag represents racist extremism to the vast majority of people. You may find that lamentable, but it's a fact.

The swastika (or tetraskelion) is actually a spiritual symbol and is quite important in Hindu and Budhist religions, amongst others. But most of the world relate it to Nazism. Same issue here.

Quote:
This has been your Bill O'Rights history lesson, for the day. By the way, I am a Civil War Re-enactor, and have portrayed soldiers, and officers, from both sides of the conflict. Hope this helps?
And a rather revisionist one at that.

I'm an armchair Civil War historian (ie, I love the subject and buy and read far too many book on the subject). Interesting subject.

Quote:
Oh, and by the way, the kid knew better. Kick her in the butt, and tell her to get on with her life.
Agreed! :-)



Mr Mephisto

Last edited by Mephisto2; 12-23-2004 at 02:05 PM..
Mephisto2 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360