Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KMA-628
Also, I mentioned this before, but no one responded, so I repeat.
Why must ID and evolution be at odds with each other? I actually believe in both. I think that an evolutionary process was put in place, but that is was put in place by a creator.
|
But that is not what I understand the ID community is trying to get into the classroom, like I wrote previously in post 56:
Quote:
|
But if I understand the ID proponents correctly, they are postulating that this designer/creator is taking an active role in how life is evolving. You know, design an eye here, create a brain there, etc.. because these things are too complicated to have evolved without the designer's personal touch along the way. And they want to teach this involvement in science class. IMHO, this is just too much of a stretch to teach as a science.
|