i would love it as long as he ran the government part of the economy in a similar fasshion to bush (don't bring spending into this) for me it would be to have my cake an eat it too. i am a very socially liberal person in regards to personal liberties and rights, but not at all in social programs. i think he could definatly strike a balance that would remain split. you have to remember the people that would get him elected are still going to have a say in his policy so you would not like every outcome in this hipothetical situation. he may be a step in the right direction to continued unity but he is not the end all be all solution.
__________________
"The difference between commiment and involvment is like a ham and egg breakfast the chicken was involved but the pig was commited"
"Thrice happy is the nation that has a glorious history. Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." Theodore Roosevelt
|