Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stevo22
A polling of historians is hardly a random sample. Its perhaps as biased a sample as one could get. Most historians are self-proclaimed liberals and anti-war to begin with. Nice find.
A lot of the members in this thread are pretty harsh. You can't base your opinions on someone because of a SNL skit or propaganda passed off as a documentary. Cynicisim can blind. Got PRK?
In 3 generations Bush will be viewed as one of the most (positively) influential presidents this nation ever had.
|
I take your comments to mean that American history is unreliable because
you have determined the bias of most historians, and that because of this,
the point of view of most historians is incorrect, but your unbiased view is
accurate. Your opinion and attitude seem alarmingly similar to what I observe
of Bush. You limit only yourself, but you and others of like mind enable
Bush to limit our country, and to an extent, the world.