|
Well let's take this from a different angle then perhaps. I think we are both in agreement that the American tradition doesn't hold a monopoly on due process, many of our own traditions were derived from traditions before our own time.
But on what grounds do you think that this ICC will be legit and just? If you read the link posted regarding the congressional bill on the matter, there were many assertations made that pointed out that there would be no due process, no double jeopardy, no trial by peers, limited access to bail, and an indefinite detention.
Maybe you know, but on what traditions are the basis of the ICC to be set up on? I'll drop the issue of authority.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
|