|
I presented an absurd analogy purposely to prove my point. You can't say one analogy is appropriate whereas the other is absurd. If one is immediately considered a murderer for killing someone just once, one should also be considered gay or bi if they orally pleasure the same sex once.
Now if the case was the one you mentioned:
1) It changes the fact that he went against his own beliefs, therefore making him a fake.
2) I couldn't care less what he eats, but if he proclaims to be a vegetarian and tries a chili dog, he is not being true to himself.
3) It doesn't change the fact that he prefers veggies over meat, but it changes the fact that he calls himself a vegetarian when he is clearly not exclusive to veggies.
4) I would be defining what I see, but either way it wouldn't make a difference to me, but I call them like I see them.
The people you mention that most consider "heroes" does not mean they are, if one followed society’s definition of “hero”, one can not think for themselves to begin with. I personally don't consider either of them "heroes", but that is for a whole other thread.
What this argument comes down to are facts, and you can’t argue facts, but you can make excuses. Being subjective doesn’t change the fact that one committed a gay action.
|