|
I agree that there are good reaons to consider something like this, but, as we seem to agree, the end result will not change because of it.
I think my strongest reason for being against this idea is that nothing has been done to convince me that the ICC could do a better jo than we already do. Its not like "international committees" are overflowing with ringing successes. Also, bear in mind that I do not believe we do the best job, but we try and our motives are clear.
So, look at is this way: Our system for governing our own works. It may not work perfectly, but it does work. Why would I consider changing my opinion if the option is as flawed or more flawed than the original?
C'mon, the international community can't agree on much, what makes you think that representatives of said community could come together, in a meeting of the minds, throwing all prejudices aside, to investigate and possibly prosecute American soldiers in an impartial manner?
roach -
I read your posts and pretty much only one thing came to my mind.
Weren't some of your heroes of time past executed, persecuted and exiled for the very beliefs you hold so dear?
Have you been executed, persecuted, exiled because you espouse similar beliefs?
Why is that?
Maybe such flippant disregard for "our boys" is a little unwarranted?
Their sacrifices, regardless of when the sacrifices took place, allow you to vocally proclaim your beliefs and values whenever or wherever you want.
Maybe they deserve a little bit more latitude than you give them?
Since the beginning of our country, they have spent every waking hour of every day risking their lives so that you may live the life you want to, to believe the things you want to believe. Whether you agree with their mission, current or past, that is the belief that drives them on. That is the belief that makes them face constant danger, willingly and voluntarily, while you postulate safely at home.
|