Having spent my K-12 years in Catholic school, I know plenty about Creation and ID.
From the faq:
Quote:
neo-Darwinism, which contends that evolution is driven by natural selection acting on random mutations, a purposeless process that "has no specific direction or goal, including survival of a species."
|
Darwin's Theory: A theory of biological evolution developed by Charles Darwin and others, stating that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual's ability to compete, survive, and reproduce. Also called Darwinian theory.
Neo-Darwinism: A theory of evolution that is a synthesis of Darwin's theory in terms of natural selection and modern population genetics.
So, ID is opposed to modern population genetics.
Genetics: The branch of biology that deals with heredity, especially the mechanisms of hereditary transmission and the variation of inherited characteristics among similar or related organisms.
ID is against the idea that the transmission of inherited characteristics among organisms cannot be governed by nature in and of itself but it is guided by God.
That, I'm sorry to say, is stupid. But only because we have actual concrete facts to back it up and ID has to resort to lying about hereditary genetics and saying, "God just did it (No further questions please)" to try and appear to be less than fallacious.