|
No argument there, I believe in a combination of the two theories after doing just a little bit of background research for myself. There are scientists who give the ID theory some credence but don't automatically throw out evolution because ID just slam dunks on evolution and blows it out of the water. RRRiiighhhttttt..... Those scientists do leave the possibility of evolution open, as good scientists should, because there is a lot of evidence in support of it, but they also leave the possibility of ID open, as good scientists should. Like I said before, this guy is going about it in the wrong way. Back to the scientists though, there are a number of them out there that do find that the ID theory deserves some credence, not in the overwhelming amount that the Christian Fundies give it, but in combination with a micro-evolution and a little bit of macro-evolution thrown in there. The gentleman probably wouldn't like these guys to support his theory because they do differ with him, but I would prefer it, and I certainly think a lot of other people do, if these scientists would come out and lend the facts that they've uncovered and help the ID flourish as a scientific theory rather than the wild ideas of crazies.
__________________
"This ain't no Ice Cream Social!"
"Hey Grif, Chupathingy...how bout that? I like it...got a ring to it."
"I have no earthly idea what it is I just saw, or what this place is, or where in the hell O'Malley is! My only choice is to blame Grif for coming up with such a flawed plan. Stupid, stupid Grif."
|