Don't worry, I don't have insurance so nobody will be paying for my chemothearpy.
Quote:
The difference is, I have enough respect for the general public that I would not bring a crying baby into a theater, unlike a smoker. if it was available, there would definately be people smoking in there. not all smokers, but the ones with shit-ass dont give a damn about anyone but themselves attitude like yours.
|
Well, big ups to you. But I've been in theatres, and people bring their snot-nosed sniveling runts in and muck up the sound. I'm sure there are smokers out there who don't smoke in crowded places too. But the great majority of them do, and the great majority of parents deem it necessary to inflict their repugnant children on the rest of us.
At least smokers aren't contributing to planetary overcrowding and excess consumption of resources. How much damage will your child inflict on the world compared to a smoker? How much fossil fuel is used by tobacco? How many third-world peasants does nicotine kill? How many people die in poverty every year so your child can grow up to be a master of the universe? Last I heard, children were working in sunless fire traps in Thailand to produce sneakers with lights in them, not cigarettes.