Originally Posted by roachboy

given that a war crime is a crime against humanity, i do not see how teh question of national sovereignty enters into consideration here. folk who are supporting the american refusal to accept the jurisdiction of the incr seem to be bent on pretending that the issue is sovereignty and not the prsecution of war crimes. i think that is false. what, then, is the basis for refusing to accept the notion that americans can and should be prsoecuted for war crimes? nothing about being prsecuted assumes guilt....