Quote:
Originally Posted by kutulu
So my wife and I just had a baby...How is this justifiable?
|
This is DEFINITELY a topic that begs for discussion.
There have been several good answers posted, but I haven't seen a few things mentioned. I'm going take a big risk and use lots of quotes. If I get a lot of negative feedback about it, I will promise never to do it again.
An employer-sponsored health plan is the result of negotiations between the employer and the insurance company. It works like this:
Employer: I've got $100/ per month to spend per employee. What can I get for that? (Note: This is why so many companies prefer to pay overtime, rather than hiring another employee and paying medical, dental, and vision insurance, vacation, sick time, maternity leave, family leave, holidays, workmen's comp, unemployment insurance, 401K/retirement, continuing education, etc.)
Insurance rep: You can have a choice of the doctors on our plan, a $20 drug deductible, but no liver transplants or Viagra.
Employer: What if I guarantee you $1000 employees on the plan you mentioned? Can I also get your enhanced benefit plan at a discount? So that I can get Viagra?
(This kind of bargaining can go on for days).
Anyway, an agreement is eventually signed. You can take it to the bank that the more doctors are on your plan, the more the company is paying the insurance company, and thus, the more the company is paying the doctors it contracts with. By the way, I know of no doctor whose annual compensation package approaches what the head of Traveler's Insurance made awhile back. His total compensation? $52 million. For one year.
I'll talk about this more later, but here's the crux of what you're asking:
The reason that prices vary is that hospitals contract with insurance companies, too. Under the terms that have been negotiated, the hospital may have agreed that setting a broken arm costs $175 with Blue Cross, but $200 with Aetna. Depends on how the negotiations went. It's important to note that the hospital has signed a contract saying that they will limit their charge to a specific amount for any patient covered by a particular insurance company.
However, if you stroll in without insurance, it's open season! They can charge whatever the hell they want, and they do! Remember that an emergency room is required by law to accept everybody, and not to inquire about their citizenship. Emergency rooms, therefore, have become the de facto family doctor for illegals. The last time I was in one, with a broken arm, I was waiting for the doctor to finish with (I'm guessing, from what I overheard) two illegal kids with head colds, and one bum with gonorrhea.
Basically, when they see you coming, they plan to make up for all the free medical care they're required to give away. I've often thought that if I didn't have insurance, I'd go to an emergency room and pretend to be from another country, so they'd have to treat me for free.
Quote:
That issue is nothing compared with the rest of the bills and how things sort out between the hospital and my insurance company. I don't have the bills with me right now, but the insurance company and I are actually paying only about half of what the hospital asked for originally. The way it works is the hospital sends a bill for 10k. The insurance compnay looks at pricing agreements and says that the bill should actually be 5k. The hospital then sends a revised bill and the insurance company pays their portion and tells me to send the rest of it to the hospital.
|
There is actually a cottage industry in which you can submit your bill to a company rep, and they will review it. Their fee is a percentage of the overcharges they find. How's that for confidence on their part?
I would advise you to look over your bill VERY carefully. Also, try to make sure that everything that was charged for was actually done, or dispensed. Billing for drugs that were not dispensed is extremely common.
Quote:
I'm assuming the actual prices that each insurance company pays is different but if a random uninsured woman got the same service we got, she'd be stuck with paying all of it. She wouldn't be able to negotiate the price. How is it legal for these types of agreements to be made?
|
You'll have to ask the trial lawyers that one. You know, the group that's the largest contributor to the Democratic party. Or maybe the union bosses. Ditto.
Quote:
Everybody should be paying the same price for the same service. Best Buy can't charge me $500 for a TV that costs the average guy $1000 so why are hospitals allowed to make agreements that serve them and screw the little guy?
|
Of course they can! Insurance these days is the equivalent of whipping a piece of paper out of your pocket and saying, "Wait! I have a discount coupon!"
Quote:
I really think there should be legislation introduced that forces the hospitals to provide the same services at the exact same prices. The govt would not be imposing any actual prices, just stating that everyone pays the same amount.
|
You won't see that while the insurance companies have lobbyists. And all that money.
Quote:
And don't forget, all hostpital workers have unions. Including the doctors. They call their union the AMA, but it's the same deal.
|
I'd love to see the reasons you feel the two are similar. Price-fixing (for doctors) is illegal, but wage fixing seems to be very popular, at least to the people who post on TFP.
Quote:
Ya and somehow I doubt they have problems with certain people paying twice as much for the same service than others with insurance. Oh wait, they have a socialized medicine program.
Of course something has to be wrong with this picture. It can't be possible that a pinko commie country does something better than the land of the free and overcharged!
|
It's not. Canada, for example, establishes an amount that they will pay for the year. Although it's been a few years since I checked, the orthopedists used to max out around August, and they'd come to the US for the rest of the year, rather than working for free. So if you wanted to break a bone in Canada, you'd better do it prior to August. Also, a mammogram had about a year-long waiting list. Canada doesn't publicize how many of its citizens pay their own way, rather than waiting a year to find out if they've got breast cancer.
Then there's Russia. If you're in a hospital there, and you want clean sheets, you'd better grease the sheets guy. Same applies to a lot of other aspects of the hospitals.
You don't want to hear about the re-use of gloves, needles, and the like. And the non-sterile equipment that doesn't work.
Quote:
Anyways, you are missing the point. The point is that two people can have identical visits to the hospital and the hospital recieved vastly different amounts from both people. Not having insurance should not mean that an x-ray costs twice as much. Uninsured people are getting fucked over.
|
Because they're paying for the people who pay nothing. I agree with you--paying for the free rides of others isn't any fun at all.
Quote:
Well travel between our countries isn't exactly open otherwise I'd seriously consider it - no joke. The healthcare I'd receive there would be vastly superior to what I would receive here with no health insurance. Again, Cuba may not have "level 3 maternity wards" (whatever the hell that is) or $20 bottles of tylenol and yet they have a lower infant mortality rate than we do. So yes, in the case bringing newborns humans into the world the Cuban system is superior to our own.
|
The issue of accurate record-keeping has already been discussed, so I'll just say that Cuba is a country that can't even get parts for cars, so I'd be leery of trusting that their hospital equipment is functional, or sterile.