Quote:
|
It conditions the assertion, it doesn't refute it, as you may be intending to do.
|
Does that mean that you do accept the logic, just not the intention?
By saying that something follows, I mean that the inference is logically consistent. We haven't got to the question of whether the inference can be used to condition or to refute the assertion that beliefs are indeed a choice. We are simply exploring the boundaries of that assertion, and looking into what accepting it might imply so as to better understand and if necessary, to better define the notion.