View Single Post
Old 12-08-2004, 06:08 AM   #24 (permalink)
Mephisto2
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by smooth
Mephisto, I don't know how you derived that 16 years is the mode for sexual consent, but I'm suspicious of its accuracy.
16 is the age of consent in the UK, Ireland, Australia and (I thought) the US.

That's where.

Quote:
I think a reasonable cut-off point should be determined case by case rather than thinking all adolescents are incapable of autonomous decisions regarding their own sexuality:
Case by case?! Come on. You know that's impossible. Each and every single case should have no fundamental baseline upon which to proceed? That's a recipe for procedural chaos. And it's also contrary to hundreds of years of legislative theory, case law and precedent.

Quote:
This woman wasn't her teacher anymore. The relationship took place after that relationship ended (EDIT: in fact, this teacher was a 7th grade teacher. Since the girl was 14 when the relationship occurred, I interpret this to mean that they have not had a teacher/student relationship for 2 or maybe even 3 years).
So what? The woman was her teacher. If the girl had been 18 before the sexual relationship, then I would have simply labeled this as inappropriate. As it occured when she was 14, it is (plain and simple) child sexual abuse. I can't believe you're defending it.

Quote:
While I understand how people can become emotional over concerns like yours, you being hot under the collar may be preventing you from understanding my position. Please don't conflate statutory rape with forceable rape simply because a group of legislaturers decided an appropriate age one can or can't make decisions about sex--they are not the same thing in my view.
That's why statutory rape and "forceable rape" (if such a legal term really exists) have different sentencing.

So what? The woman exploited her position to sexually abuse a child; indeed, to rape a child.

Quote:
I don't subscribe to the notion that laws are derived from (or reflective of) the social beliefs of a community.
If laws are not derived from the social beliefs of a community, then what are they derived from?

Actually, I'm confused by this position. What on Earth do you think laws are? By simple definition, laws enact the social mores of the society in which they are defined. How else can you see them?

Quote:
If you do get interested in that perspective (because a respectful group of scholars do believe it, just not my group), it's called functionalism and is embodied in the works of people like Emile Durkheim.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here. That "functionalism" is indicative of a denial that laws reflect the social and moral context in which they are defined? Or that Emile Durkheim postulates that laws do reflect such notions?

Quote:
So, you knowing by now that I'm a conflict theorist (more in line with Karl Marx or, more accurately, Max Weber), understand that I'm more inclined to see law as a construct of those in power to retain their control over scarce resources.
That's most certainly a Marxist political theory; I'm not familiar with Weber. I'm surprised you subscribe to Marxism which has proven to be completely and utterly wrong in almost all its precepts.

Now, dont' get me wrong. I consider myself a socialist. Perhaps more accurately, a democratic socialist. I'm certainly far to the left of most people on this board. And I was raised in a household full of Marxist (and even Leninist) political theory, practice and paraphenalia. So I'm not ignorant of its tenets. But everyone knows (or should know) that Marxist politics is simply bankrupt and irrelevant in today's society.

Quote:
In this case, the sexuality of young women as well as lesbians in a patriarchal society.
I simply don't understant this statement. In my mind, this has nothing to do with the sexual preference of the perpertrator, but everything to do with sexually abusing (and raping) a minor.


Quote:
P.S. I have no idea when I'll be able to leave the states. But believe me, I'm working on it as fast as I can! I'm actually hoping to start on a fullbright to get us over there before my Ph.D. is completed. Just have to figure out what I might have to offer Oz.
Looking forward to it mate! Nothing like a good political sparring match...


Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360