I'm sure if you give me the funding I can do a study that accounts for variables in such a way to prove whatever point I want to make.
This article is so vague in detailing how they decided to remove, account for, etc. variable to show what ever exactly this is showing, it's almost completely useless. The use I'm seeing is as a starter for a discussion on use of computers in learning pro/con.
I mean this, "However, they then took into account that schools with better computer availability also have better resources in general" seems self contradictory to me. Wouldn't computers BE part of the better resources?
I mean, what's being said here?
If the ability to access the volume of information available though computer use is bad, I can only accept that if the reason is the substution of search results for a thought process.
I don't even see the point in discussing a claim like this, so I'm not typing any more.
__________________
I can sum up the clash of religion in one sentence:
"My Invisible Friend is better than your Invisible Friend."
|