Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kadath
Agreed. To simply parrot a single piece of scientific theory as a reason we should give up on an entire realm of scientific discovery shows either a lack of sophistication or a deliberate disinterest in learning anything new.
|
That's nice.
I'm "parroting", but eveyone else here is progressive in their embrace of the new fronntier, eh?
Labeling someone a "parrot" because they refer to the proven laws of physics, and not current
unproven theoretical hypotheses is a bit shortsighted.
If you disagree with me, and have factual reasons rather than an emotional attachment to the "idea" of interstellar travel, then please provide them; or simply be polite in said disagreement.
Quote:
|
The reason I can say this is I used to hold this exact same view until about three years ago, when I started reading Hawking and realized that Einstein was not the be-all and end-all of advanced physics.
|
I never said he was. Indeed, I simply made passing reference to the EPR Paradox, which I stated was refuted.
Quote:
Also, I find myself shocked to agree with Ustwo, but I can console myself with the fact that I think NASA should be funded by heavily taxing the wealthy. 
|
Funny.
Especially rich
Doctors, eh?
Just kidding Ustwo!
Mr Mephisto