Quote:
Originally Posted by Locobot
I'm sorry, but you're dead wrong about this and I encourage you to do some research. All science must satisfy both the ethics of topics and findings (morality), and the ethics of method and process (integrity). Concentration camp "experiments" rarely met the standard of integrity and never met the standard of morality therefore they cannot be considered scientific.
|
I guess i was using the "of or employing the scientific method" as my definition of scientific. I don't make the distinction between morality. Science is science, regardless of the morality of the experiments. Scientific integrity is different than ethical or moral integrity. Or maybe i should say, useful data can be culled from experiments, even though the experiments themselves lacked morality. I wasn't considering data integrity or accuracy to be a matter of ethics, at least not the same kind of ethics we consider when discussing torture.