Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Art
"IMO, discussions are a means toward indicating the limits of what is discussable...nothing more."
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Art
"I think we can only go so far in using words to examine words."
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Art
"There are many who will find those endless circular paths interesting. I'm just not one of them."
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Art
"I think the current language that is in common usage is sufficient to address current experience. I attempt to use it to negate or short-circuit itself as much as possible "
|
Art, these are some of your more fascinating responses during this discussion (which by the way appears to have derailed itself now) You use circular arguments, then deride those who find them interesting, you state that you prefer to use common language, then you state that you like to negate and short circuit it. It ends up coming across as highly contradictory, almost belligerent. I know you don't mean to do this, but it would help keep things on track if you avoided making vague and unusual statements and then getting all stroppy when people reasonably request clarifications or start pointing out inconsistencies with your curious ideas.