View Single Post
Old 12-06-2004, 01:52 PM   #19 (permalink)
Mephisto2
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by guthmund
I just don't seem to understand why the big stink about this particular book? There are countless books filled to the brim with conspiracy theorys about...well, concerning just about everything and everyone. What makes this book different? Is it because we (the readers) have intensely focused on this book or rather we've been focused intensely on this book?
Because it has been so very popular. I'm not the only one who finds this noteworthy.

It has spawned an entire industry in follow-up books. It is also notable enough to have had an effect on tourism in the places depicted in the book.

That's what makes it different.

Quote:
I think it's the focus that's been put on it. Critics are as much to blame for the "Da Vinci" maddness that they like turning their noses up at. I knew a ton about this book from other sources before I even picked up the book. Articles were everywhere, related material in Time and Newsweek and afterwards a couple of television shows "investigating" the claims made by Brown, one on prime time ABC, no less. You mention the gullibility of the "vast majority." How many millions of books did this guy sell? How many of his millions of readers carry round dog eared copies, threaten tour guides or write nasty letters to the Catholic church? Not many, I'd bet. He's sold millions of books and reached a very big audience. It stands to reason that his "nutball" percentage is going to be a bit higher, but the "vast majority?" I don't think so.
Well, I never said "vast majority" and I searched this thread and no one else did either.

The point is, and I'm not the only person saying this, is that this particular book seems to have hit upon a resonance in current "Western" readers; particularly those in the US (though this may simply be because it's sold so well there).

Quote:
I think if the "critics" had left this book alone and simply treated it like every other piece of fiction that runs across their desks, it would've died out to it's cult following a long time ago. But they haven't and with a movie coming out their not likely to start ignoring the source material anytime soon.
Well, I don't think the critics "made" this book. I think, as I said above, it seems to have come at the right time. It plays on peoples fears (vast conspiracy), their yearning for some kind of modern spirituality, the uneasiness after 9/11 etc. These are not only my suppositions, but those of several commentators.


Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360