|
Most proof for creationism that I have seen has basically been along the lines of ruling out other possibilities, leaving intelligent design as the remaining possibility. Therefore, I would accept the original link the 'evidence' pile. The remaining evidence is indeed the Bible, which does not satisfy scientists as there is no known litmus test for its truth or falsehood.
Pure creationism is nearly impossible to defend, as a 7 day-long creation would not leave the fossil record as it is.
'Guided' evolution actually works better with current data than pure evolution, as it sidesteps problems from gaps and why would sexual animals ever come into existence when that mutation would require a creature of the same species and opposite gender (interesting mutation!) to reproduce.
I personally believe in a higher power who had a hand in creation, but from the fossil record it looks like He must have done it over a long period of time.
__________________
It's not getting what you want, it's wanting what you've got.
|